On Iau, 2005-06-30 at 09:00, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> + for (i = 0;i < 8;i++) {
> + set_dma_addr(i, 0x000000);
> + /* DMA count is a bit wierd so this is not 0 */
> + set_dma_count(i, 1);
It is spelt "weird"
Looks basically OK although it would be good to document the situation
for a bus mastering DMA controller. Does the device have to reconfigure
the DMA on a resume or is that something the restore code for the device
should handle ?
My own feeling is tha we should dump that on the device (safer) and also
expect the device to prevent suspends during an active DMA transfer (eg
floppy)
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]