The exact patch for kernel/module.c that was marked for 2.6.11-rcX hit general release in patch-2.6.12.
What $PID is bash running as ? Martin's comments on this are seem most relevant.
Can you build your own (2 pages of code) init process, that does something along the lines of
* gracefully handles SIGCHLD * forks * executes bash * waits for bash to exit much like the patch doesSo bash is not running a pid 1. While nash is expected to run as init, bash is not, so fixing bash might also break it (its a complex beast).
-- Darryl L. Miles - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.12 initrd module loading seems parallel on bootup
- From: Christian Trefzer <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 initrd module loading seems parallel on bootup
- References:
- Re: 2.6.12 initrd module loading seems parallel on bootup
- From: "Darryl L. Miles" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 initrd module loading seems parallel on bootup
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 initrd module loading seems parallel on bootup
- From: "Darryl L. Miles" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 initrd module loading seems parallel on bootup
- From: Christian Trefzer <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 initrd module loading seems parallel on bootup
- From: Toon van der Pas <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 initrd module loading seems parallel on bootup
- From: "Darryl L. Miles" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 initrd module loading seems parallel on bootup
- From: Christian Trefzer <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 initrd module loading seems parallel on bootup
- Prev by Date: Re: AE_NO_MEMORY on ACPI init after memory upgrade and oops
- Next by Date: Re: [Patch] Janitorial cleanup of GET_INDEX macro in arch/i386/pci/fixup.c
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.12 initrd module loading seems parallel on bootup
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.12 initrd module loading seems parallel on bootup
- Index(es):