Ross Biro wrote:
>On 6/29/05, Hubert Chan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 01:09:05 -0400, Horst von Brand <[email protected]> said:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hubert Chan <[email protected]> wrote: [...]
>>>And doing "tar cf /dev/tape /usr/games/tetris" gives you a nice tangle
>>>of undecipherable junk.
>>>
>>>
>
>I'm confused. Can someone on one of these lists enlighten me?
>
>How is directories as files logically any different than putting all
>data into .data files and making all files directories (yes you would
>need some sort of special handling for files that were really called
>.data).
>
Add to this that you make .data the default if the file within the
directory is not specified, and define a stanadard set of names for
metafiles, and you've got the essential idea, and any differences are
details.
> Then it's just a matter of deciding what happens when you
>call open and stat on one of these files?
>
>For backwards compatibility, current existing system calls have to
>treat these things as directories. Perhaps an exception could be made
>for exec.
>
>But we could have a whole new set of system calls that treat things as
>magic, and if files as directories is as cool as many people think,
>apps will start using the new api. If not, they won't and the new api
>can be deprecated.
>
> Ross
>
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
