Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [-mm patch] CONFIGFS_FS: "If unsure, say N."

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 02:47:38AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> But I get your point, what about the patch below?

	Non-descriptive.  We are descriptive for sysfs (and even allow
the choice!).  I'd say that leaving the description but perhaps adding
the caveat about modules and unsure-N might be a good way to go.

Joel

-- 

"If you are ever in doubt as to whether or not to kiss a pretty girl, 
 give her the benefit of the doubt"
                                        -Thomas Carlyle

Joel Becker
Senior Member of Technical Staff
Oracle
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (650) 506-8127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [-mm patch] CONFIGFS_FS: "If unsure, say N."
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

References:
- [-mm patch] CONFIGFS_FS shouldn't be user-visible
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] CONFIGFS_FS shouldn't be user-visible
  - From: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
- [-mm patch] CONFIGFS_FS: "If unsure, say N."
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [-mm patch] CONFIGFS_FS: "If unsure, say N."
Next by Date: Re: kmalloc without GFP_xxx?
Previous by thread: [-mm patch] CONFIGFS_FS: "If unsure, say N."
Next by thread: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [-mm patch] CONFIGFS_FS: "If unsure, say N."
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]