Re: kmalloc without GFP_xxx?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Jörn Engel wrote:

>
> All nice and well.  But still, for the sake of simplicity and me not
> wanting to think, I prefer always using spin_lock_irqsave for
> everything.  Since when should I stop and think about my own code?

OK, I use spin_lock_irqsave first, and then I only use spin_lock when I
already know interrupts are off.  But the locks I usually use are used by
interrupts and that is reason enough to use it.  I wouldn't use the
_irqsave for simplicity, I use it since I still believe it keeps latency
down for SMP.

>
> In fact, why don't we all sit down and start using KCSP for kernel
> hacking? ;)
>

Naw, I'm doing my PhD on implemting Linux drivers in SmallTalk. That will
make everybody happy!

-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux