* William Weston <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > [...] but i think i'm going to revert that, it's causing too many
> > > problems all around.
> >
> > reverted it and this enabled the removal of the extra ->disable() you
> > noticed - this should further speed up the IOAPIC code. These changes
> > are in the -50-34 kernel i just uploaded.
>
> -50-34 fixed the wakeup latency regression I was seeing on my Athlon
> box with -50-33, and seems a bit more responsive than -50-25. Max
> wakeup latency is back down to 14us (from 39us), even while running
> JACK (xrun free) and two instances of burnK7. Overall system response
> is probably the best I've seen with the RT kernels ;-}
great! The SMP box running BurnP6 is another system, right? Could you
sum up the remaining regressions you are seeing under -RT? (the
latency.c warning is one, what others are remaining?)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
