Kylene Jo Hall wrote: > >Here is the patch that should fix the problem. Pierre can you remove >the first patch I sent and test this one? > > > Apart from an improperly closed enum the patch worked fine. Great work! Rgds Pierre - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp [PATCH 1 of 2]
- From: Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp [PATCH 1 of 2]
- References:
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp [PATCH 1 of 2]
- From: Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp [PATCH 1 of 2]
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp [PATCH 1 of 2]
- From: Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] s390: fix finish_arch_switch
- Next by Date: Re: sysfs abuse in recent i2o changes
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp [PATCH 1 of 2]
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp [PATCH 1 of 2]
- Index(es):