Hi, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> The rationale for this is that since NULL is not guaranteed to be zero
> by the C standard
... as opposed to the other 632719 places in the kernel source where
we do the exact same thing?
If Linux ever gets ported to an architecture where NULL is not
all-bits-zero, the resulting patch will be so damn huge that the
cleanliness-or-not of freevxfs will be the *least* of our worries.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [email protected]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
- -
You'd best be snoozin', 'cause you don't be gettin' no work done at 5 a.m.
anyway.
-- From the wall of the Wurster Hall stairwell
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
