On Jun 28, 2005, at 20:25:02, Sean wrote:
there will be a price to pay if the linux community fragments over choiceof scm.
I don't agree. With the current set of SCMs, I don't think it will be long before somebody invents a gitweb/Mercurial/whatever gateway, such that I can
"hg serve" from my Mercurial repository and have Linus "git pull" from a multiprotocol bridge.
the good news is that we're no longer locked into the whims ofsome proprietary system. so it should be straight forward for those who choose any tool to work with those who've chosen another. this is already evidenced by the fact that the git repository is pulled and re- exeportedwith mecurial.
I agree completely! Cheers to the end of proprietary revision storage!
anyway, all the best, just wish you guys would spend less time trying toconvert git users and more time advancing your own tool.
A project with no users isn't much of a project, now is it? In any case, this thread has long since passed its usefulness, so let's let it die, ok?
Cheers, Kyle Moffett --I lost interest in "blade servers" when I found they didn't throw knives at people who weren't supposed to be in your machine room.
-- Anthony de Boer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: Vojtech Pavlik <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- References:
- Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: Petr Baudis <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: Christopher Li <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: Petr Baudis <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: "Sean" <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: "Sean" <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: "Sean" <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: "Sean" <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- From: "Sean" <[email protected]>
- Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] amd64-agp: Add SIS760 PCI ID
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] amd64-agp: Add SIS760 PCI ID
- Previous by thread: Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- Next by thread: Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- Index(es):