On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 05:29:51PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:58:17PM -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > @@ -673,6 +704,7 @@ struct pci_driver {
> > int (*enable_wake) (struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state, int enable); /* Enable wake event */
> > void (*shutdown) (struct pci_dev *dev);
> >
> > + struct pci_error_handlers err_handler;
> > struct device_driver driver;
> > struct pci_dynids dynids;
> > };
>
> Shouldn't that be a pointer and not the whole structure? Wouldn't that
> make it easier to "reuse" error handlers?
Yes, it's a good idea. In fact we could have a generic NIC error
handler structure then that just calls the watchdog timeout function.
I suspect that would be sufficient for most NICs.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]