On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 15:27 -0400, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
> Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
> >> As I mentioned previously when this patch was first posted to the list,
> >> AFS writes to the syscall table. It does this even for Linux 2.6.
> >> Apparently, the rodata section is not actually mapped read-only, so this
> >> patch will probably not break AFS; nonetheless, it seems it would still
> >> be better to keep the syscall table in a section that is supposed to be
> >> writable.
>
> > Maybe this needs to be fixed?
>
> It would probably be better implemented with a more generic mechanism,
> but I don't believe anyone is working on that now, so it looks like AFS
> will continue to use a special syscall.
the kernel afs doesnt' seem to need a special syscall....
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
