Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386

On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:26:43PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Note that AFS seems to be modifying the syscall table. Is that legit?

No.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386
Next by Date: Re: wrong madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) semantic
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]