> (btw. does no output in dmesg mean that no TPM chip was found? it seems > to have found a pci id it likes atleast.) > True I think if a chip is found there should be info in dmesg. Are you loading tpm_atmel or tpm_nsc? You can look at /proc/misc or see if /sys/class/misc/tpm0 exists. Do you know if your machine has a TPM? Is it activated in BIOS? Thanks, Kylie > Rgds > Pierre > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- References:
- 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Kylene Jo Hall <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
- 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2][TRIVIAL] Allocate kprobe_table at runtime
- Next by Date: Re: [Patch] Janitorial cleanup of GET_INDEX macro in arch/i386/pci/fixup.c
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.12 breaks 8139cp
- Index(es):