Re: [PATCH] xip cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 28 June 2005 14:01:59 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> adjust to kernel style and remove some unneeded NULL checks

Cool!

>  	rc = __inode_direct_access(inode, sector, &data);
> -	if (rc)
> -		return rc;
> -	clear_page((void*)data);
> -	return 0;
> +	if (!rc)
> +		clear_page(data);
> +	return rc;

I personally prefer the original code.  As a general rule, error
handling code is indented further than regular good-case code.  That
makes reading a *lot* faster and the compiler should be smart enough
to generate identical code.

What are your arguments for the change?

> -		(mapping->host,tmp.b_blocknr*(PAGE_SIZE/512) ,&data);
> +		(mapping->host,tmp.b_blocknr * (PAGE_SIZE/512), &data);
                               ^
You missed one.

Jörn

-- 
Fancy algorithms are slow when n is small, and n is usually small.
Fancy algorithms have big constants. Until you know that n is
frequently going to be big, don't get fancy.
-- Rob Pike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux