Re: [patch 2] mm: speculative get_page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David S. Miller wrote:

From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [patch 2] mm: speculative get_page
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:50:31 +1000


William Lee Irwin III wrote:


On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:42:16AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:

spin_unlock() does not imply a memory barrier.


Intriguing...


BTW, I disagree with this assertion.  spin_unlock() does imply a
memory barrier.

All memory operations before the release of the lock must execute
before the lock release memory operation is globally visible.


Yes, it appears that way from looking at a sample set of arch
code too (ie. those without strictly ordered stores put an
explicit barrier there).

I've always understood spin_unlock to imply a barrier.


Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux