On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 09:08 -0400, Rik Van Riel wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > -+ sem_is_read_locked(mm->mmap_sem)) > > + sem_is_read_locked(&mm->mmap_sem)) > > Yes, you are right. I sent out the patch before the weekend > was over, before having tested it locally ;) > > My compile hit the error a few minutes after I sent out the > mail, doh ;) > > Andrew has a fixed version of the patch already. > Ok, thanks - wanted to test it, and just wanted to verify that my changes are OK. Regards, -- Martin Schlemmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- [PATCH] 0/2 swap token tuning
- From: Rik Van Riel <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] 2/2 swap token tuning
- From: Rik Van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 2/2 swap token tuning
- From: Martin Schlemmer <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] 2/2 swap token tuning
- From: Rik Van Riel <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] 0/2 swap token tuning
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC,PATCH] RCU: clean up a few remaining synchronize_kernel() calls
- Next by Date: Re: reiser4 plugins
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] 2/2 swap token tuning
- Next by thread: [PATCH] 1/2 swap token tuning
- Index(es):