Re: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file

On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 10:36:55AM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
> Jivin Russell King lays it down ...
> > drivers/serial/68328serial.c:int register_serial(struct serial_struct *req)
> > drivers/serial/68328serial.c:void unregister_serial(int line)
> 
> These can go.  AFAICT they were never used and I have no idea why they
> are there.

Thanks David.  I've just committed a patch to remove these.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file
  - From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file
  - From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file
  - From: David McCullough <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] fs:lock_rename()/unlock_rename() can lead to deadlock in distributed fs.
Next by Date: Re: reiser4 plugins
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file
Next by thread: SMP+irq handling broken in current git?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]