[2.6 patch] let TCP_CONG_ADVANCED default to n

It doesn't seem to make much sense to let an "If unsure, say N." option 
default to y.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

--- linux-2.6.12-mm2-full/net/ipv4/Kconfig.old	2005-06-26 14:40:17.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.12-mm2-full/net/ipv4/Kconfig	2005-06-26 14:40:43.000000000 +0200
@@ -442,19 +442,18 @@
 	  
 	  If unsure, say Y.
 
 config IP_TCPDIAG_IPV6
 	def_bool (IP_TCPDIAG=y && IPV6=y) || (IP_TCPDIAG=m && IPV6)
 
 config TCP_CONG_ADVANCED
 	bool "TCP: advanced congestion control"
 	depends on INET
-	default y
 	---help---
 	  Support for selection of various TCP congestion control
 	  modules.
 
 	  Nearly all users can safely say no here, and a safe default
 	  selection will be made (BIC-TCP with new Reno as a fallback).
 
 	  If unsure, say N.
 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6 patch] let TCP_CONG_ADVANCED default to n
  - From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [2.6 patch] drivers/isdn/: make some code static
Next by Date: Re: x86_64 access of some bad address
Previous by thread: PROBLEM-UPDATED: ehci-hcd storage device resets during I/O with kernels 2.6.12.1 (vanilla)
Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] let TCP_CONG_ADVANCED default to n
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]