On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 14:03 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > I have no intent, nor method, of doing so. rdtsc is a direct instruction, > without intervention, as I understand it. I thought so too, but it turns out the CPU lets you disable it at boot. This was suggested as a possible fix for the alleged hyperthreading vulnerability. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.
- Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] better USB_MON dependencies
- Next by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] ORT - Oops Reporting Tool
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.12-mm1 boot failure on NUMA box.
- Index(es):
 |