On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I only know that this boots correctly since I have no system that can do
> > suspend. But Ray needs an effective means of process suspension for
> > his process migration patches.
>
> Any i386 or x86-64 machine can do suspend... It should be easy to get
> some notebook... [What kind of hardware are you working on normally?]
Umm... Sorry to be so negative but that has never worked for me on lots of
laptops. Usually something with ACPI or some driver I guess... After
awhile I gave up trying.
> > But is this the correct way to fix this?
> It includes whitespace changes and most of patch is nice cleanup that
> should probably go in separately. (Hint hint :-).
Ok.
> Previous code had important property: try_to_freeze was optimized away
> in !CONFIG_PM case. Please keep that.
Obviously that will not work if we use try_to_freeze for
non-power-management purposes. The code from kernel/power/process.c may
have to be merged into some other kernel file. kernel/sched.c?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]