Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jun 23, 2005, at 19:56:34, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 06:24:54PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Things in git-land are moving at lightning speed, and usability has
improved a lot since my post a month ago: http://lkml.org/lkml/ 2005/5/26/11

And here's a quick comparison with the current state of Mercurial..

Oooh!!! Nice!!! This is my new official source keeper for my next project. I especially like the fast operation and low disk storage requirements. Many kudos to Matt Mackall for his awesome program! The efficient network protocol
is great too!

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
 -- C.A.R. Hoare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux