Re: [patch][ia64]Refuse kprobe on ivt code- take 2

>>>>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:23:33 -0700, Keshavamurthy Anil S <[email protected]> said:

  Anil> On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 12:10:38PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
  >> >>>>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:45:46 -0700, Keshavamurthy Anil S <[email protected]> said:
  >> Surely you meant to use the declaration from sections.h instead?

  Anil> Take 1: This patch is based on review comments from David Mosberger,
  Anil> now checking based on .text.ivt
  Anil> Take 2: now including sections.h :-)

Looks fine to me.

Thanks,

	--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch][ia64]Refuse kprobe on ivt code
  - From: Keshavamurthy Anil S <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch][ia64]Refuse kprobe on ivt code
  - From: David Mosberger <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch][ia64]Refuse kprobe on ivt code
  - From: Keshavamurthy Anil S <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch][ia64]Refuse kprobe on ivt code
  - From: David Mosberger <[email protected]>
- [patch][ia64]Refuse kprobe on ivt code- take 2
  - From: Keshavamurthy Anil S <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] i386: enable REGPARM by default
Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/ne3210.c: cleanups
Previous by thread: [patch][ia64]Refuse kprobe on ivt code- take 2
Next by thread: 750GX HID1 sysctl interface
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]