Re: SATA speed. Should be 150 or 133?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: SATA speed. Should be 150 or 133?
From: Krzysztof Oledzki <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35:24 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]



On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Mark Lord wrote:

<CUT>

Oh, so how to check true (current) speed?

Same as always:  hdparm -I /dev/sd?
(requires the libata-dev "passthru" patch
recently reposted here by Jeff Garzik).


Got it :)

# hdparm -I /dev/sda

/dev/sda:
(...)
        DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 *udma6
(...)

This one? udma6?

Best regards,


			Krzysztof Olędzki

References:
- SATA speed. Should be 150 or 133?
  - From: Krzysztof Oledzki <[email protected]>
- Re: SATA speed. Should be 150 or 133?
  - From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: SATA speed. Should be 150 or 133?
  - From: Krzysztof Oledzki <[email protected]>
- Re: SATA speed. Should be 150 or 133?
  - From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: RE: page allocation/attributes question (i386/x86_64 specific)
Next by Date: 2.6.12-mm1 keyboard oddities
Previous by thread: Re: SATA speed. Should be 150 or 133?
Next by thread: Re: HRT proposal (on top of timeofday and soft-timer rework)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux