Chris Mason wrote:
On Friday 24 June 2005 00:59, jmerkey wrote:
Jan Beulich wrote:
It's a GBD replacement and is not fully open source.
What is not open source in it ()?
KDB is at present more capable. It has a lot of promise, but it does not
have the all the architectural
features necessary to replace either KDB or GDB at present.
While I never used or saw kdb, I'd be curious about what you immediately
saw missing...
1. No back trace
2. Doesn't run standalone fully embeded in the kernel
3. Not fully open source (since it's not embeded in the kernel)
4. IA64 doesn't really matter, since IA64 is basically dead anyway
5. No advanced recursive descent parser for conditional breakpoints
This is more or less completely inaccurate.
Which one -- more ? or less ?
Jeff
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
