--Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote (on Saturday, June 25, 2005 00:14:26 +1000):
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 00:11, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> --Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote (on Tuesday, June 21, 2005 13:03:44
> -0700):
>> > "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Or I guess it's binary chop
>> >> search amongst sched patches (or at least the ones that are new in
>> >> this -mm ?)
>> >
>> > Yes please.
>>
>> OK, still broken with the last 3 backed out, but works with the last
>> 4 backed out. So I guess it's scheduler-cache-hot-autodetect.patch
>> that breaks it. Con just sent me something else to try to fix it in order
>> to run next ... will do that.
>
> Sorry, that patch I sent isn't a fix for any known problem, it's another tweak
> to my code. If you have breakage elsewhere don't waste your time with my code
> just yet.
OK, I'll stack that on top of backing out the last 4 patches, which fixed moe.
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
