Re: [PATCH] dst_entry structure use,lastuse and refcnt abstraction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, David S. Miller wrote:

> From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> > The patch also removes the atomic_dec_and_test in dst_destroy.
> 
> That is the only part of this patch I'm willing to entertain
> at this time, as long as Herbert Xu ACKs it.  How much of that
> quoted %3 gain does this change alone give you?

Nothing as far as I can tell. The main benefit may be reorganization of 
the code.

> Also, please post networking patches to [email protected].
> Because you didn't, the majority of the networking maintainers
> did not see your dst patch submissions.  It's mentioned in
> linux/MAINTAINERS for a reason:
> 
> 	NETWORKING [GENERAL]
> 	P:	Networking Team
> 	M:	[email protected]
> 	L:	[email protected]
> 	S:	Maintained
> 
> Thanks.

Yes and it was recently changed. Typical use is [email protected]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux