On Iau, 2005-06-23 at 21:49, Michael Dreher wrote:
> My impression: reiser3 is not 100% stable, but quite stable,
> written by someone who asks for "review by benchmark".
Review by uniprocessor benchmark perhaps. However Reiser4 is new code.
The original extfs on Linux was not very good either while ext2 was
excellent. It seems inappropriate to technically review one fs based on
the other. Looking at the authors maintenance record I think is
important but every single star Linux kernel contributors first major
contribution was generally not very good.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
