On Iau, 2005-06-23 at 19:22, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Besides, does a modern i386 really require them? DOS compatibility is no
> longer an issue for commodity hardware and the ISA bridge is gone.
Untrue on both counts
> Apparently the only legacy device still not replaced by anything else is
> the RTC, which is rather surprising as there seems to be a lot of
> reasonable alternatives for I2C available these days and i386 boxes have
> had I2C for quite a while now.
DMA controller, floppy controller, keyboard, serial, mouse, parallel,
some video ports, random other objects on the lpc bus, miscellaneous
motherboard gunge.
> Both IDE and video are distinct PCI devices these days, so there is no
> need for them to hide their decoded address ranges. I've thought that has
> been sorted out.
We still support older machines that are pre PCI even. Most PC systems
also have ranges of non-PCI decoded space that appears in no PCI bar.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]