Re: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file

[Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>]

Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 02:23:35PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> >...
> > However, wouldn't it be a good idea if this file was ordered by "when" ?
> > A quick scan of the file reveals a couple of overdue/forgotten items
> > (maybe they happened but the entry in the file got missed?):
> >...
> > What:   register_ioctl32_conversion() / unregister_ioctl32_conversion()
> > When:   April 2005
> >...
> 
> The removal (including the removal of the feature-removal-schedule.txt 
> entry) is already in -mm.

Perhaps they should be moved to a REMOVED file, with the date (and version)
the patch went in? For future generations who wonder when something was
axed...
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/