Re: aio_down() patch series -- cancellation support added

[Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>]

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 05:46:14PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> Add linux-kernel to the Cc list...
> 
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 05:38:35PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > The patch series at http://www.kvack.org/~bcrl/patches/aio-2.6.12-A1/ 
> > now adds support for cancellation of an aio_down() operation.  The 
> > races should be correctly handled by introducing per-kiocb locking 
> > that serialises ->ki_cancel() and ->ki_retry().  The interesting patch 
> > additions are 40_lock_kiocb 50_aio_down_cancel.diff.  Comments?
> > 
> > 		-ben
> > -- 

One quick question.
Since lock_kiocb() may block, does that mean that the aio worker thread
could be put to sleep while an iocb cancellation is in progress, even though
there may be other iocbs/ioctx's to process ?

Looking at the rest a little more closely in terms of how everything
will fit together, a few questions come to mind - need to think
about it a little more. I guess the main reason you need the aio_down_wait
callback is to make sure the semaphore is grabbed right in the context
of the wakeup rather than at retry time, is that correct ?

Regards
Suparna

-- 
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/