"Richard B. Johnson" <[email protected]> writes:
> nanosleep() appears to have a problem. It may be just an
> 'accounting' problem, but it isn't pretty. Code that used
> to use usleep() to spend most of it's time sleeping, used
> little or no CPU time as shown by `top`. The same code,
> converted to nanosleep() appears to spend a lot of CPU
> cycles spinning. The result is that `top` or similar
> programs show lots of wasted CPU time.
usleep() is just a wrapper around nanosleep(). Are you sure you got the
units right?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [email protected]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
