Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Karim Yaghmour wrote:

> To be honest, however, I have a very hard time, as a user, to
> convince myself that I should enable preempt_rt under any but
> the most dire situations given the results I now have in front
> of me. Surely there's more of an argument than "this will cost
> you as much as SMP" for someone deploying UP systems, which
> apparently is the main target of preempt_rt with things like
> audio and embedded systems.

What situation do you consider dire?

I do appreciate the testing that you've done and I hope you do more in the 
future. Remember that PREEMPT_RT is a fast moving object, we need those 
kinds of tests every day .. 


Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux