On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 00:04 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > if you want to be fair, you should > compare it to the SMP kernel Well, if you want to be even more fair, you could hold off on publishing benchmark results that compare an experimental, not fully debugged feature with a mature technology. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- References:
- PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- From: Kristian Benoit <[email protected]>
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- From: Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- Prev by Date: Re: Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.12 with dual way dual core ck804 MB
- Previous by thread: Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- Next by thread: Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- Index(es):
 |