Ingo Molnar wrote:
> otherwise par_test_irq_handler will run with interrupts enabled, opening
> the window for other interrupts to be injected and increasing the
> worst-case latency! Take a look at drivers/char/lpptest.c how to do this
> properly. Also, double-check that there is no IRQ 7 thread running on
> the PREEMPT_RT kernel, to make sure you are measuring irq latencies.
We'll check on this also. Thanks for pointing it out.
Karim
--
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || [email protected] || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
- Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]