Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
> otherwise par_test_irq_handler will run with interrupts enabled, opening 
> the window for other interrupts to be injected and increasing the 
> worst-case latency! Take a look at drivers/char/lpptest.c how to do this 
> properly. Also, double-check that there is no IRQ 7 thread running on 
> the PREEMPT_RT kernel, to make sure you are measuring irq latencies.

We'll check on this also. Thanks for pointing it out.

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || [email protected] || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux