Re: ARM Linux Suitability for Real-time Application

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:52:40AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Russell King wrote:
> > If you're just after some background process to run off interrupts with
> > minimal interrupt latency, the good news is that you don't have to modify
> > the kernel on ARM, and you certainly don't need any RT patches.
> > 
> > If you use the FIQ, then your FIQ latency will be the time it takes the
> > CPU to enter your FIQ function.  Since the kernel _never_ disables FIQs
> > in any way, FIQs have ultimate priority over everything else in the
> > system.
> > 
> 
> Aren't FIQ's only on some ARM's ? 

Yes, but please read the original mail.  I think you'll find my reply
is completely relevant to the question being posed, which was based
upon the AT91RM9200 SoC.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux