Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lee Revell wrote:
> Ingo, what's the status of putting irq 0 back in a thread with
> PREEMPT_RT?  IIRC this had some adverse (maybe unfixable?) effects so it
> was disabled a few months ago.
> 
> I don't think there's much point in comparing i-pipe to PREEMPT_RT if we
> know that 21usec pipeline effect from the timer IRQ (see list archives)
> is still there.

A link to the archives somewhere would be greatly appreciated, this is
a very high traffic list after all...

Thanks,

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || [email protected] || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux