Hi, Is it not simpler to ask the reiserfs guys for a detailed explanation of why and where this plugins' layer differs from using VFS for plugins and let others comment on that ? If something cant be done using VFS this layer is needed by reiser4 and has to be merged. Michele - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: [email protected] (Markus Törnqvist)
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- References:
- -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- reiser4 plugins
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Christophe Saout <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: [email protected] (Markus Törnqvist)
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <[email protected]>
- -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
- Prev by Date: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (fuse)
- Next by Date: Re: reiser4 plugins
- Previous by thread: Re: reiser4 plugins
- Next by thread: Re: reiser4 plugins
- Index(es):