On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 05:34:54PM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Hi Andrew & Shaggy,
> Here is the summary of 2K lun testing on 2.6.12-mm1.
> When I tune dirty ratios and CFQ queue depths, things
> seems to be running fine.
> echo 20 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
> echo 20 > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_ratio
> echo 4 > /sys/block/<device>/queue/nr_requests
> But, I am running into JFS problem. I can't kill my
> "dd" process. They all get stuck in:
> (I am going to try ext3).
If you could get unabridged profiling data for raw vs. fs (so it can
be properly sorted) I would be interested in that. Early indications
were large amounts of time spent in shrink_zone(), obtained by
re-sorting the truncated profile listings. It indicated the time spent
in shrink_zone() was 26.3 times as much time spent in default_idle().
Typically copying to and from userspace are enormous overheads, but
aren't observable in the truncated/mis-sorted profiles, which calls
them into question, barring unreported usage of O_DIRECT. There are
also no totals reported, which are helpful for interpreting realtime
behavior.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]