On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 13:11 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Or I can wait until you go next. I didn't want these patches in the -mm > > tree as they would have caused you too much work to keep up to date and > > not conflict with anything else due to the size of them. > > What happens if we merge it and then the storm of complaints over the > ensuing four weeks makes us say "whoops, shouldna done that [yet]"? so... disable the config option now. then wait 3 weeks. then do the rest ;) undoing the config change is easy compared to undoing the rest...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
- References:
- [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
- Prev by Date: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
- Next by Date: Re: e1000 driver works on UP, bt not SMP x86_64 (2.6.7 -2.6.12)
- Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
- Next by thread: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git
- Index(es):
 |