get_user_pages() and shared memory question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Is it possible for a page of memory that's been "grabbed" with get_user_pages() to ever be allocated to another process? I'm assuming the answer is no, but I have a specific case I want to ask about.

Let's say an application allocates some shared memory, and then calls into a driver which calls get_user_pages(). The driver exits without releasing the pages, so they now have a reference count on them. Then the application deallocates the shared memory. At this point, the virtual addresses disappear, and no process owns them, but the pages still have a reference count.

Another process now tries to allocate a shared memory buffer. Is there any way that this new buffer can contain those pages that were grabbed with get_user_pages() (i.e. that already have a reference count)?

Until 2.6.7, there was a bug in the VM where a page that was grabbed with get_user_pages() could be swapped out. Those of you familar with the OpenIB work know what I'm talking about. Would that bug affect anything I'm talking about?

--
Timur Tabi
Staff Software Engineer
[email protected]

One thing a Southern boy will never say is,
"I don't think duct tape will fix it."
     -- Ed Smylie, NASA engineer for Apollo 13
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux