Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (Suspend-to-disk)

Hi!

> > kexec and kdump
> > 
> >     I guess we should merge these.
> > 
...
> No potential clashes with suspend code, I assume?
> 

I test suspend in -mm series from time to time, and it seems ok;
so this one should be safe.
				Pavel
-- 
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms         

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (Suspend-to-disk)
  - From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [RFC: 2.6 patch] better USB_MON dependencies
Next by Date: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (fuse)
Previous by thread: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (Suspend-to-disk)
Next by thread: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (Suspend-to-disk)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]