Re: Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention?

On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 14:50 +0800, colin wrote:
> Hi all,
> Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention?
> Can you summary it?

http://www.google.com/search?q=2.6.11.1+release

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention?
    • From: "colin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: UML mode panick under 2.6.12
• Next by Date: Re: ipw2100: firmware problem
• Previous by thread: Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention?
• Next by thread: Re: Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]