On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 22:45 +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 06:57:04PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > > I don't think they have anything in the BIOS related to the HDAPS, else they > > > > would have put something in it. (You can't even disable the chip in the > > > > BIOS) I just think is the accelerometer, there, by itself with an extra card > > > > they added. > > > > > > Well, some piece of software needs to park the HDD when the notebook is > > > falling, and that piece of software should better be running since the > > > notebook is powered on. Hence my suspicion it's in the BIOS. It doesn't > > > have to be visible to the user, at all. > > > > Actually yes, it needs to be visible to the user and no, it probably > > should not run during boot. If user is in plane/train, > > accellerometers will basically detect problems all the time; still you > > want to use the computer. > > It likely won't. What it does is that it detects a situation with no > gravity - free fall. > > > (And you still want the machine to boot => default == fall detection off). > > It will boot. It may boot slower if you're jumping from an airplane at > the time, but it'll just park the heads now and then, which, with > IBM/Hitachi drives doesn't take long. > > > IIRC there's windows program to control it. > > That's likely. What good would a feature be for marketing if it wasn't > visible to the user. ;) > This paper tells about the "heuristic learning algorithm" used to park the drives: http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=MIGR-53432 It seems that by IBM's calculations, desk-to-floor distance is insufficient time to detect freefall and park the heads. So they actually park the heads when it detects "starting to slide off table"... Freefall detection: 300 ms Head park time: 300-500 ms (from page 2 of document) Still doesn't seem too bad to figure out how to code though, at least once we can figure out how to get the data stream! P.S. The main control system runs as a Windows kernel driver. Not as safe as full hardware, but probably better than userspace. :) Thanks, Adam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?
- References:
- Re: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?
- From: Vojtech Pavlik <[email protected]>
- Re: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?
- From: Vojtech Pavlik <[email protected]>
- Re: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?
- From: Vojtech Pavlik <[email protected]>
- Re: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?
- Prev by Date: Re: PROBLEM: Devices behind PCI Express-to-PCI bridge not mapped
- Next by Date: Re: Linux-2.6.12 memory mapping broken
- Previous by thread: Re: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?
- Next by thread: Re: IBM HDAPS Someone interested?
- Index(es):