James Morris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > I'll be looking for things to drop, too - it's getting a bit crazy.
>
> Any reason to keep the Netlink connector code?
>
Well it does fill a gap: something which presents a higher-level interface
to netlink capabilities. There are several places in the kernel which do
open-coded hand-rolled netlink communications, so regularisation and
consolidation is a good thing there, if it's possible.
But the current connector implementation does that in an unpopular manner,
so we're a bit stuck.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
