Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
If you don't like goto, don't read kernel code!
But his patch also cleans up a code quit a bit.
As a wider question, what is the practice for accepting patches without
functional changes that simply clean up code and make it look better?
BTW, I also agree that the gotos in this case keep the normal code flow
cleaner, while making the exceptions isolated well.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
