Re: 2.6.12: connection tracking broken?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bart De Schuymer wrote:
> Op ma, 20-06-2005 te 04:45 +0200, schreef Patrick McHardy:
> 
>> Bart, can you explain why the hooks are defered please?
> 
> This is done so that iptables knows which bridge port the output device
> is, using the iptables physdev match.

In which cases is this necessary? AFAICT the output device is determined
in br_handle_frame_finish() for a normally bridged packet.

> Can't you release the conntrack reference with a function registered on
> the POSTROUTING hook with a prio higher than nat POSTROUTING (or
> something like that)?

We would have to hold the reference while the packet is queued at the
device for the bridge case, which we want to avoid.

Regards
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux