Re: [PATCH] Small kfree cleanup, save a local variable.

On 6/19/05, Michael Buesch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Quoting Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>:
> > Here's a patch with a small improvement to kernel/auditsc.c .
> > There's no need for the local variable  struct audit_entry *e  ,
> > we can just call kfree directly on container_of() .
> 
> Did you look at the assembly output? Does it change?
> I think the compiler optimizes this variable away, anyway.
> So, if there's no improvement, I would personally prefer the
> original form as it's more readable.
> 
gcc does optimize it away. 
Personally I find both forms equally readable, and with the change the
source matches what the code actually ends up as, but I don't care
much one way or the other.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Small kfree cleanup, save a local variable.
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Small kfree cleanup, save a local variable.
    • From: Michael Buesch <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Small kfree cleanup, save a local variable.
• Next by Date: [PATCH] selinux: endian annotations
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Small kfree cleanup, save a local variable.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Small kfree cleanup, save a local variable.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]