On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 10:11 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 10:02:26AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 02:20:48AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 00:18 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > > Thinking about what's probably happening, I suspect all the ARM suspend
> > > > and resume code needs to be reworked to save more state. I'll try to
> > > > cook up a patch tomorrow to fix it, but I'll need you to provide
> > > > feedback.
> > >
> > > Ok, thanks. I'm happy to test any fixes/patches.
> >
> > This should resolve the problem - we now rely on the stack pointer for
> > each CPU mode to remain constant throughout the running time of the
> > kernel, which includes across suspend/resume cycles.
>
> Actually, this patch is probably an all-round better solution.
This patch (the simpler of the two using cpu_init()) allows the pxa to
suspend/resume happily with the git-arm-smp.patch applied.
Richard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
