On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 19:36 -0700, randy_dunlap wrote: > On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:48:59 -0700 (PDT) David Lang wrote: > > | On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, aq wrote: > | > | > the version number is a little bit confused here: if I want to upgrade > | > from for example 2.6.11.5 to 2.6.12, which patch should I get? > | > | you reverse the 2.6.11 -> 2.6.11.5 patch to get back to a vinilla 2.6.11 > | then you apply the 2.6.11->2.6.12 patch. > > Hrm, I expected ketchup to be able to handle that already. > Does it not? It worked for me. Ian. -- Ian Campbell We is confronted with insurmountable opportunities. -- Walt Kelly, "Pogo"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- Re: Linux 2.6.12
- From: Nick Warne <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.12
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.12
- From: aq <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.12
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.12
- From: randy_dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.12
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.12] Add -Wno-pointer-sign to HOSTCFLAGS
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.12] Add -Wno-pointer-sign to HOSTCFLAGS
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.12
- Next by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.12
- Index(es):
 |