Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!: how bad?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[snip]
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 14:59 -0700, David L wrote:
> I'm seeing the message:
>
> bad: scheduling while atomic!

It indicates a kernel bug, which could range from harmless to very bad.

Usually that message is accompanied by a stack trace, can you provide a
real log excerpt?
Is this what you need?

bad: scheduling while atomic!
[<c02a930f>]
[<c01f8c47>]
[<c01e6aea>]
[<c0120211>]
[<c01e6b30>]
[<c010f9a0>]
[<c02a8ff9>]
[<c010f9a0>]
[<c0120040>]
[<c0123983>]
[<c0123900>]
[<c0103b25>]

(or do you need config.gz and/or something else to make sense of it?)

Cheers...

          David

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar ? get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux